Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit c4216681 authored by Max New's avatar Max New
Browse files

final version of talk

parent caeeb053
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
...@@ -133,6 +133,11 @@ Next: Axioms ...@@ -133,6 +133,11 @@ Next: Axioms
- emphasize the axioms to derivations more - emphasize the axioms to derivations more
- emphasize reasoning principles rather than type safety - emphasize reasoning principles rather than type safety
- future work: more complex type features - future work: more complex type features
*** Problems
- Weak transition in intro
- From there are a bunch of semantics to our contributions
- Inconsistent terminology
- soundness principles, type soundness, semantic principles
** Questions ** Questions
- What about blame? - What about blame?
- We don't give a treatment of blame in the paper, but a paper by - We don't give a treatment of blame in the paper, but a paper by
...@@ -141,7 +146,7 @@ Next: Axioms ...@@ -141,7 +146,7 @@ Next: Axioms
positive party positive party
- And we argue in the paper that that is related to our proof - And we argue in the paper that that is related to our proof
that upcasts are pure and downcasts are linear that upcasts are pure and downcasts are linear
- Even CBV Eta is violated by pointer/object equality? - Eta is violated by pointer/object equality?
- right, and for this reason the simple wrapping semantics of - right, and for this reason the simple wrapping semantics of
contracts/casts doesn't work for those systems, and people contracts/casts doesn't work for those systems, and people
introduce proxies introduce proxies
......
No preview for this file type
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment